Hi.

I have a .NET assemblies documentation project in the DocumentX 6.0.0.19 and I have the following problem:

1. Constructors of abstract classes do not include in the generated documentation.
2. Generated documentation does not contain "Explicit Interface Implementation" section, like in MSDN. DocumentX recognize implemented methods and properties as regular methods and properties. Additionally, they have incorrect names (such as SystemComponentModelIEditableObjectBeginEdit).

1. An abstract class, by definition, does not logically have a constructor - leaving it out of the documentation is by design;

2. Can you please drop an email to support@innovasys.com with a copy of your assembly and details of the class and member that you are seeing documented with an incorrect name so that we can investigate that further. Although Document! X does document the interfaces that your classes implement (in the syntax section), it does not generate an Explicit Interface Implementation section.

Just to let you know that the forums here are for peer to peer support - although we do monitor them can we please request that any bug reports or requests that you need a direct response from Innovasys for be sent to support@innovasys.com so that we can manage them appropriately. Alternatively, they can be submitted using our online issue report form. Thanks.